Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,604 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carly Schwartz in San Francisco results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Sunk Cost Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 1,581 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,261 of 6,368 authors). This Carly Schwartz in San Francisco is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
Carly Schwartz in San Francisco
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
18%Carly Schwartz in San Francisco (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,812
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

17% percentile
025507510017.4% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos