Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Camille Hoffman results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 833 hits . Analysis detected 4,127 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,993 of 6,382 authors). This Camille Hoffman is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. Camille Hoffman
Author details
Total words: 4,880
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 17.1% 17.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 17.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst