Topic summary
23% 37 analyzed articles/videos 8,388 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daylight Saving Time results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 5,017 hits . Analysis detected 59,240 faulty-reasoning hits from 80,033 analyzed words across 37 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (15,035 of 15,849 topics). This Daylight Saving Time is better (less manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group. Daylight Saving Time
Topic details
Total words: 80,033
Article count: 37
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.1% percentile 1.4% BS Score37 analyzed articles80K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst