BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 111 hits. Analysis detected 894 faulty-reasoning hits from 598 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.6% and a BS Rank of 49% (11,278 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the article peer group.

Congress is one step closer to making daylight saving time permanent. 
On July 14, the House of Representatives passed a bill that would allow states to enact daylight saving time year-round, a shift from the existing practice of changing clocks twice a year. 
If the legislation is passed by the Senate and signed into law, it would largely stop the practice of moving clocks an hour forward in the spring and an hour back in the fall. 
Introduced by Rep. 
Vern Buchanan, R-Florida, the Sunshine Protection Act of 2025 passed the House 308-117 after years of failed efforts in Congress to reform daylight saving time. 
Here's what to know about the latest push to make daylight saving time permanent. 
What is it? 
Daylight saving time is the practice of setting clocks forward an hour from March until November in an effort to gain more sunlight during the summer months. 
According to the Library of Congress, it was first enacted in 1918 as a fuel cost-saving measure during World War I. 
Daylight saving time became federal law under the Uniform Time Act of 1966. 
Under the law, some states and U.S. territories can opt to exempt themselves. 
Daylight saving time is not observed in Hawaii, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and most of Arizona, according to the Department of Transportation. 
The U.S. used year-round daylight saving time during World War II and enacted it again in 1974 to reduce energy use, Reuters reported, but it proved deeply unpopular and Congress repealed it later that year. 
What’s the bill’s status? 
The permanent daylight saving time bill still has a ways to go before it can become law. 
Next, it heads to the Senate, where its fate remains uncertain. 
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said it was not clear whether the bill could garner the 60 votes needed for passage in the chamber, Reuters reported July 15. 
If the legislation clears Congress' upper chamber, it will go to President Donald Trump's desk for him to sign. 
Trump in the past expressed support for permanent daylight saving time, so it appears likely that, if it is passed by the Senate, he would sign it into law. 
In a May social media post, he called daylight saving time a "ridiculous, twice yearly production." 
"I am going to work very hard to see The Sunshine Protection Act signed into Law. 
It’s time that people can stop worrying about the 'Clock,'" he wrote. 
What would happen? 
If permanent daylight saving time becomes law, it would do away with a "spring forward" in March and a "fall back" in November, 
Meaning, the move would prompt later sunrises and sunsets during a significant portion of the year. 
Supporters, like Buchanan, argue that permanent daylight saving time would have positive health effects. 
Bill backers say changing the clocks disrupts sleep, increases workplace injuries and contributes to more road accidents, Reuters reported. 
They argue keeping clocks an hour ahead year-round would provide more evening daylight and boost economic activity during the winter months. 
Critics  the bill faces opposition from Sen. 
Tom Cotton, R-Ark., and others  note the change would mean the sun rises an hour later on winter mornings, leaving more children traveling to school and commuters, construction workers, farmers and others heading to work before daylight, Reuters reported. 
In some places, the sun would not rise until almost 9 a.m. or later at the height of winter. 
The group Airlines for America said it would have major implications for travelers. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 3.0%Arizona Daily Star: 3.0%Confirmation Bias9.0%This article: 4.8%Melina Khan USA Today: 1.6%Arizona Daily Star: 1.6%Anchoring Bias4.8%This article: 5.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 3.8%Arizona Daily Star: 3.8%Availability Heuristic5.0%This article: 4.5%Melina Khan USA Today: 1.5%Arizona Daily Star: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic4.5%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 2.0%Arizona Daily Star: 2.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Melina Khan USA Today: 1.6%Arizona Daily Star: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias4.8%This article: 12.2%Melina Khan USA Today: 5.6%Arizona Daily Star: 5.6%Framing Effect12.2%This article: 2.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.7%Arizona Daily Star: 0.7%Loss Aversion2.0%This article: 4.5%Melina Khan USA Today: 3.7%Arizona Daily Star: 3.7%Status Quo Bias4.5%This article: 4.2%Melina Khan USA Today: 1.4%Arizona Daily Star: 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect4.2%This article: 11.4%Melina Khan USA Today: 7.7%Arizona Daily Star: 7.7%Optimism Bias11.4%This article: 4.7%Melina Khan USA Today: 1.6%Arizona Daily Star: 1.6%Pessimism Bias4.7%This article: 18.4%Melina Khan USA Today: 6.1%Arizona Daily Star: 6.1%Negativity Bias18.4%This article: 2.7%Melina Khan USA Today: 1.6%Arizona Daily Star: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.2%Melina Khan USA Today: 2.4%Arizona Daily Star: 2.4%Recency Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.6%Melina Khan USA Today: 7.0%Arizona Daily Star: 7.0%Appeal to Authority18.6%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.7%Melina Khan USA Today: 5.0%Arizona Daily Star: 5.0%Hasty Generalization6.7%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 7.5%Arizona Daily Star: 7.5%Appeal to Emotion7.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.7%Melina Khan USA Today: 4.6%Arizona Daily Star: 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.7%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.4%Melina Khan USA Today: 2.1%Arizona Daily Star: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.4%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.7%Melina Khan USA Today: 1.8%Arizona Daily Star: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection2.7%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 2.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.7%Arizona Daily Star: 0.7%Indoctrination2.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melina Khan USA Today: 0.0%Arizona Daily Star: 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

598 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers43%attributed speech339writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageLibrary of Congress • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Transportation • 29 words • 0.0% coverageReuters • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Thune • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 29 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 16 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageReuters • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageReuters • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAirlines for America • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
73 attributed words28% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Quote-first Misdirection+21.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 21.9%21.9%Indoctrination+16.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 16.4%16.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.