Keyword summary
23% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,786 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Library Of Congress results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,600 hits . Analysis detected 11,922 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,436 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (32,190 of 35,923 keywords). This Library Of Congress is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group. Library Of Congress
Keyword details
Total words: 16,436
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst