Keyword summary
24% 8 analyzed articles/videos 1,133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Permanent Daylight Saving Time results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 1,247 hits . Analysis detected 11,547 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,665 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (29,487 of 35,068 keywords). This Permanent Daylight Saving Time is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Permanent Daylight Saving Time
Keyword details
Total words: 15,665
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst