Author summary
48% 1 analyzed article/video 535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Silow-Carroll results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 131 hits . Analysis detected 1,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,605 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,321 of 6,364 authors). This Andrew Silow-Carroll is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Andrew Silow-Carroll
Author details
Total words: 1,605
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.5% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst