Publication summary
64% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,805 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Orlando Sentinel results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 3,245 hits . Analysis detected 29,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 44,586 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 20% (330 of 410 publications). This Orlando Sentinel is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 44,586
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.6% percentile 1.3% BS Score16 analyzed articles44.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst