Antoine Griezmann scores in MLS debut as Orlando City beat Earthquakes 4-0 ⁠3%

By Associated Press⁠60%

7/23/2026, 10:01:03 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Status Quo Bias, and Recency Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 118 faulty-reasoning hits from 271 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 14.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (21,331 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the article peer group.

SAN JOSE, Calif. 
(AP) — Antoine Griezmann scored in his MLS debut, David Brekalo and Iván Angulo each scored his first goal of the season, and Orlando City beat the San Jose Earthquakes 4-0 on Wednesday night in the first game for both teams since before the World Cup break. 
Griezmann was acquired in March from Atlético Madrid — where he is the club’s all-time leading scorer with 211 goals and 97 assists in 488 matches — with the understanding that the 35-year-old forward would report to Orlando after the conclusion of the La Liga season. 
Braian Ojeda added a goal for Orlando (5-9-2). 
Maxime Crépeau had seven saves. 
Brekalo was left unmarked and flicked in a header off a perfectly placed free kick played into the center of the area by Eduard Atuesta to open the scoring in the seventh minute. 
Atuesta pushed a pass to Angulo, who faced no pressure as he approached the penalty box and ripped a low shot that skipped past Gunn to make it 2-0 in the 29th minute. 
It was Angulo’s first goal since Oct. 5, 2024, against Cincinnati. 
Angus Gunn made his MLS debut and had three saves for the Earthquakes (10-4-2). 
Gunn, a 30-year-old Scotland international, signed with San Jose on July 8 after he was released by the Premier League’s Nottingham Forest FC. 
The Earthquakes traded goalkeeper Daniel De Sousa Britto — known simply as “Daniel” — to Dallas on July 9. 
Daniel had 14 shutouts in 78 regular-season starts across three-plus seasons with San Jose. 
AP soccer: https://apnews.com/soccer 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.2%Orlando Sentinel: 2.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Orlando Sentinel: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 3.2%Orlando Sentinel: 2.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Orlando Sentinel: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Orlando Sentinel: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.1%Orlando Sentinel: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 7.1%Orlando Sentinel: 5.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Orlando Sentinel: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.2%Associated Press: 0.6%Orlando Sentinel: 0.3%Status Quo Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.1%Orlando Sentinel: 3.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.6%Orlando Sentinel: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 8.7%Orlando Sentinel: 7.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.0%Orlando Sentinel: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Orlando Sentinel: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Orlando Sentinel: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 17.0%Associated Press: 2.3%Orlando Sentinel: 3.3%Halo Effect17.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%Associated Press: 1.4%Orlando Sentinel: 0.8%Recency Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Orlando Sentinel: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Orlando Sentinel: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 3.4%Orlando Sentinel: 2.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Orlando Sentinel: 0.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Orlando Sentinel: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.7%Orlando Sentinel: 3.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Orlando Sentinel: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 4.7%Orlando Sentinel: 4.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Orlando Sentinel: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.2%Orlando Sentinel: 3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Orlando Sentinel: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.7%Orlando Sentinel: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.2%Orlando Sentinel: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.3%Orlando Sentinel: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 17.3%Associated Press: 3.0%Orlando Sentinel: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice17.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Orlando Sentinel: 0.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Orlando Sentinel: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Orlando Sentinel: 4.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

271 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers10.0%attributed speech244writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageBraian Ojeda • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMaxime Crépeau • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAngus Gunn • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Angus Gunn

0%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words52% of attributed speech48% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-19.3 ptsWriter: 19.3%Angus Gunn: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.