AP News53%

House passes bill to ‘ditch the switch’ and make daylight saving time permanent 33%

By KEVIN FREKING38%

7/14/2026, 2:45:47 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Bandwagon as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 573 faulty-reasoning hits from 488 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.4% and a BS Rank of 33% (14,743 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the article peer group.

House passes bill to ‘ditch the switch’ and make daylight saving time permanent 
WASHINGTON (AP)  There will be no turning back the clock if the House has its way. 
The House passed a bill Tuesday that would make daylight saving time permanent. 
Proponents, including the White House, argued the change would provide more daylight during the times that Americans are most active. 
The vote was 308-117. 
Daylight saving time is that period between spring and fall when clocks in most parts of the United States are set one hour ahead of standard time. 
States could opt out if their respective legislatures act to do so before the bill’s enactment. 
The Senate would also have to pass the bill before it could be signed into law, but it’s unclear if it will do so. 
Rep. 
Gus Bilirakis, R-Fla., said Americans are ready to “ditch the switch,” saying that changing the clock twice a year creates unnecessary disruption. 
More important, he said, it would give families more daylight time in the evening to spend outdoors and support local businesses. 
“In my home state of Florida where tourism is a cornerstone of our economy, having more predictable daylight hours is a practical improvement that benefits workers, businesses and visitors alike,” Bilirakis said. 
Rep. 
Jim McGovern, D-Mass, said he supported the bill, but he questioned whether it was the best way for Congress to be spending its time. 
“For folks getting crushed by rent, groceries, utility bills and healthcare costs, is this really the best the majority can do? 
Is this really the most pressing issue before the American people at this moment?” 
McGovern said. 
Detractors said permanent daylight saving time would lead to darker and potentially more hazardous winter mornings where children will be waiting for school buses and parents will be driving to work in darkness. 
A 2025 poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research shows that if forced to choose, most Americans would prefer to keep that extra hour of daylight in the evening. 
If they had to choose one option for the entire country to use, more than half of adults  56%  prefer making daylight saving time permanent, with less light in the morning and more light in the evening. 
About 4 in 10 prefer standard time, with more light in the morning and less in the evening. 
The White House weighed in before the House vote, calling the “Sunshine Protection Act” a popular, common-sense reform and saying advisers would recommend the president sign the bill if it reaches his desk. 
Members of Congress have long been interested in the potential benefits and costs of daylight saving time since it was first adopted as a wartime measure in 1942. 
The Senate passed a bill four years ago to make daylight saving time permanent, but it stalled in the House. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.6%Kevin Freking: 0.8%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 1.5%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 3.0%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.8%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.5%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 1.2%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.3%Kevin Freking: 9.9%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect12.3%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.6%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.7%Kevin Freking: 1.2%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias5.7%This article: 4.1%Kevin Freking: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect4.1%This article: 3.5%Kevin Freking: 2.0%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias3.5%This article: 6.8%Kevin Freking: 2.2%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias6.8%This article: 11.7%Kevin Freking: 6.8%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias11.7%This article: 6.6%Kevin Freking: 3.0%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.7%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.3%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 4.8%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.9%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Kevin Freking: 1.0%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect6.8%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 1.7%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 4.9%Kevin Freking: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.8%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.5%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.8%Kevin Freking: 2.0%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority6.8%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 3.4%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 6.8%Kevin Freking: 0.8%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope6.8%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 4.4%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.3%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 14.5%Kevin Freking: 1.1%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon14.5%This article: 4.3%Kevin Freking: 8.3%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion4.3%This article: 3.5%Kevin Freking: 0.9%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question3.5%This article: 5.7%Kevin Freking: 1.6%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.7%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.3%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.9%Kevin Freking: 0.3%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof2.9%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.7%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.7%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.3%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.5%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 1.5%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.1%Kevin Freking: 4.3%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice4.1%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.3%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.4%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.9%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Freking: 0.3%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

488 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers34%attributed speech321writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageGus Bilirakis • 22 words • 0.0% coverageGus Bilirakis • 21 words • 0.0% coverageGus Bilirakis • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageJim McGovern • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJim McGovern • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJim McGovern • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageThe White House • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

The White House

100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words20% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.2 ptsWriter: 6.2%The White House: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.