Speaker summary
66%7 analyzed articles/videos208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These the White House results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Red Herring, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 141 faulty-reasoning hits from 208 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (24,307 of 28,364 speakers). This the White House is better (less manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510014.3% percentile
11.3% BS Score7 analyzed videos208 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 13.9%13.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 11.1%Red Herring: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate