BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 346 faulty-reasoning hits from 353 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.7% and a BS Rank of 37% (13,347 of 21,164 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the article peer group.

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. 
(WBRC) - The U.S. 
House has passed the Sunshine Protection Act, a bill that would make daylight saving time permanent and end the twice-yearly practice of changing clocks. 
Alabama has already passed state legislation to make the switch if Congress acts. 
Under current law, clocks move forward in March and back in November. 
Permanent daylight saving time would eliminate both changes. 
The trade-off is more light in the evening and less in the morning. 
For Alabama, staying on daylight saving time year-round would mean winter sunrises closer to 8 a.m., after many commuters are already on the road and students are heading to school. 
Winter sunsets, which currently fall around 4:45 p.m., would shift to nearly 6 p.m., adding roughly an hour of evening daylight. 
WBRC First Alert Chief Meteorologist Wes Wyatt noted the seasonal shift already underway. 
“As we go through each season, we lose daylight, we gain daylight,” Wyatt said. 
“In fact, we’ve lost about 13 minutes of daylight since the start of summer. 
The days are getting shorter and we’re heading towards a winter season.” 
Alabama Sen. 
Tommy Tuberville has supported the measure for years, citing constituent demand and the impact on children’s outdoor time. 
“We have to get our kids back involved in outside activities. 
You can’t do that for four, five, six months because it’s dark when they get home already,” Tuberville said. 
“One of the top things I hear from people back in Alabama, ‘when are we going to keep the clock the same?’ 
Lock the clock,” he said. 
Not all lawmakers support the bill. 
Several senators on both sides of the aisle have voted against it, citing concerns about dark winter mornings, safety for early commuters, and potential health impacts of waking up before sunrise for extended periods. 
The bill is now before the Senate. 
If it passes and is signed by President Trump, it would take effect Nov. 1, the date clocks would normally fall back. 
Get news alerts in the Apple App Store and Google Play Store or subscribe to our email newsletter here. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Abby Haymond: 4.2%WBRC: 4.2%Availability Heuristic6.2%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Abby Haymond: 6.3%WBRC: 6.3%Framing Effect2.3%This article: 3.7%Abby Haymond: 1.2%WBRC: 1.2%Loss Aversion3.7%This article: 3.7%Abby Haymond: 1.2%WBRC: 1.2%Status Quo Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.9%Abby Haymond: 4.6%WBRC: 4.6%Pessimism Bias13.9%This article: 9.6%Abby Haymond: 3.2%WBRC: 3.2%Negativity Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Abby Haymond: 1.7%WBRC: 1.7%In-Group Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.7%Abby Haymond: 1.2%WBRC: 1.2%Appeal to Authority3.7%This article: 3.7%Abby Haymond: 1.2%WBRC: 1.2%False Dilemma3.7%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.9%Abby Haymond: 8.2%WBRC: 8.2%Hasty Generalization13.9%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 3.8%WBRC: 3.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.2%Abby Haymond: 8.3%WBRC: 8.3%Appeal to Emotion8.2%This article: 6.2%Abby Haymond: 2.1%WBRC: 2.1%Begging the Question6.2%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.2%Abby Haymond: 8.0%WBRC: 8.0%Anecdotal6.2%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.2%Abby Haymond: 2.1%WBRC: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.2%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 1.0%WBRC: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Abby Haymond: 0.0%WBRC: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Abby Haymond: 5.4%WBRC: 5.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.4%

353 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers37%attributed speech221writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWBRC • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWes Wyatt • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWes Wyatt • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWes Wyatt • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWes Wyatt • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageTommy Tuberville • 18 words • 0.0% coverageTommy Tuberville • 11 words • 0.0% coverageTommy Tuberville • 19 words • 0.0% coverageTommy Tuberville • 22 words • 0.0% coverageTommy Tuberville • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Tommy Tuberville

93%flagged-word coverage
75 attributed words57% of attributed speech67% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.6 ptsWriter: 8.6%Tommy Tuberville: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.