Keyword summary
57% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,081 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United States Congress results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,109 hits . Analysis detected 8,961 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,578 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (32,286 of 35,718 keywords). This United States Congress is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group. United States Congress
Keyword details
Total words: 12,578
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst