Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DANICA KIRKA results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 549 hits . Analysis detected 3,578 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,205 of 6,359 authors). This DANICA KIRKA is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group. DANICA KIRKA
Author details
Total words: 4,444
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 12.3% 12.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst