Keyword summary
27%7 analyzed articles/videos1,774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United States Senate results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 887 hits. Analysis detected 6,375 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,450 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (36,317 of 37,536 keywords). This United States Senate is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.
United States Senate
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
4%United States Senate (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

3% percentile
02550751003.2% percentile
1.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate