Keyword summary
37% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tommy Tuberville results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 658 hits . Analysis detected 7,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,798 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (26,530 of 35,444 keywords). This Tommy Tuberville is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Tommy Tuberville
Keyword details
Total words: 7,798
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst