Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Darren Major results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Nature as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 347 hits . Analysis detected 2,422 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,162 authors). This Darren Major is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Darren Major
Author details
Total words: 3,460
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Author 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Nature: Author 10.0%, sitewide 0.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst