Publication summary
52% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,709 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ABC7 Chicago results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 1,137 hits . Analysis detected 5,243 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,260 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 72% (118 of 410 publications). This ABC7 Chicago is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 6,260
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.4% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.3% 6.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 18.2% 18.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 18.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst