Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These The Detroit News results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 406 hits . Analysis detected 2,320 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,079 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,365 authors). This The Detroit News is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. The Detroit News
Author details
Total words: 2,079
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.5% 19.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst