Author summary
60% 1 analyzed article/video 532 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ANDREW SILOW-CARROLL/JTA results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 354 hits . Analysis detected 3,373 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,534 of 6,628 authors). This ANDREW SILOW-CARROLL/JTA is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group. ANDREW SILOW-CARROLL/JTA
Author details
Total words: 3,192
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.8% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst