Publication summary
31% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,099 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Jerusalem Post results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,194 hits . Analysis detected 10,954 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,378 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 52% (200 of 410 publications). This The Jerusalem Post is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 13,378
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst