Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,567 analyzed words
BS Summary: These RIZK ALABI results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Optimism Bias , and False Dilemma , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 497 hits . Analysis detected 2,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (5,051 of 6,378 authors). This RIZK ALABI is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group. RIZK ALABI
Author details
Total words: 6,268
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst