Topic summary
50% 21 analyzed articles/videos 11,547 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cuba results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 8,009 hits . Analysis detected 57,926 faulty-reasoning hits from 52,848 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (11,234 of 15,142 topics). This Cuba is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group. Cuba
Topic details
Total words: 52,848
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score21 analyzed articles52.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst