Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,538 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Petti results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 2,257 hits . Analysis detected 10,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,152 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,656 of 6,288 authors). This Matthew Petti is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group. Matthew Petti
Author details
Total words: 10,152
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.2% 22.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst