Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sam Skove results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 461 hits. Analysis detected 3,466 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,170 authors). This Sam Skove is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sam Skove
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Sam Skove (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,716
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 22.3%22.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 15.2%15.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.1%11.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.8%9.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 13.1%13.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 6.6%6.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 26.9%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 22.3%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 15.2%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 10.0%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 8.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Genetic Fallacy: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Burden of Proof: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos