Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Gooding results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 1,728 hits . Analysis detected 7,883 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,040 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,520 of 6,251 authors). This Dan Gooding is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Dan Gooding
Author details
Total words: 8,040
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.5% 21.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 21.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst