Topic summary
76% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Spending results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,745 hits . Analysis detected 16,289 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,641 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,568 of 16,519 topics). This Consumer Spending is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. Consumer Spending
Topic details
Total words: 16,641
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles16.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.5%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst