Americans rewire their grocery shopping routines while digesting the biggest price jump in 50 years 4%

By DEE-ANN DURBIN54% TERRY TANG0% MAGGIE SCALES0% SANDY GUATIBONZA0% HIKARI MAE HIDA0% Associated Press60%

7/25/2026, 5:06:09 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 135 hits. Analysis detected 259 faulty-reasoning hits from 935 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 18.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (21,045 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.20% of the article peer group.

What’s for dinner? 
Lately, at Apral Jack’s house, it’s whatever is on sale. 
Jack, 50, scouts an app for deals at her local supermarket before she buys groceries. 
When she reaches the store, she looks in the weekly circular for coupons she might have missed. 
If shelf prices look too high, she tries to find lower prices someplace else. 
“The apples went up here, the ones I eat, so now I’m not going to get them here,” Jack said as she pushed a cart into a Stop & Shop near her home in Lexington, Massachusetts. 
Couponing, comparison shopping and cutting back on favorite foods are new habits for her and millions of other Americans as they absorb the biggest jump in grocery prices in a half-century. 
Buying food to eat at home has gotten 33% more expensive since the beginning of 2019, according to government figures. 
With a conflict in the Middle East creating more price pressures, the cost of filling refrigerators, freezers and pantries has made affordability a central issue in the fall midterm elections. 
Residents of four urban areas where food inflation has exceeded the national average shared how steadily rising prices are changing the way they shop. 
They described hunting for discounts, switching to store brands and feeling grateful for food banks. 
Some are buying less meat and skipping nonessentials like cookies. 
Others are buying less food overall. 
Meat becomes a luxury for a family in Texas, the nation’s top beef producer 
Beef epitomizes out-of-control grocery prices for many Americans. 
The price of a pound of ground beef reached $6.82 in June, which is 79% more than at the beginning of 2019, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data. 
Ada Torres, 60, who lives 45 miles northeast of Houston in Cleveland, Texas, is one of the people no longer buying it. 
She does the grocery shopping and cooking for the home she shares with her daughter and three grandchildren. 
“Prices are sky-high. 
One hundred dollars’ worth of groceries these days is nothing,” Torres said. 
Chicken and cold cuts are the family’s main source of animal protein now that fresh meat is a luxury, she said. 
Her grandchildren, ages 12, 15 and 16, miss eating lasagna with ground beef, beef fajitas and steak with plantain chips. 
Torres’ daughter is the family’s main provider. 
Her work for a mobile car-washing service dwindles during the rainy season; the family only can afford one full meal a day, Torres said. 
Shopping outside Boston takes research and multiple stores 
Apral Jack, a care provider and part-time Amazon worker, has fewer mouths to feed now that her three daughters are adults. 
But she spends more cautiously than she once did. 
Instead of shopping at Whole Foods, she builds her weekly menu around discounts and digital coupons. 
“Typically, I’ll try to pick the meals based on that. 
So like chicken fajitas: there was a three-day sale on chicken,” Jack said. 
Nabisco Ginger Snaps and Nilla Wafers are off her shopping list. 
Jack won’t buy store brand replacements. 
To her, they don't taste the same. 
Three generations share food pantry eggs and produce to get by in San Francisco 
San Francisco has a reputation as foodie city. 
Food preoccupies 33-year-old Jack Chang for other reasons. 
The self-employed barber has three young children and a partner who is unemployed. 
“Since I have five mouths I have to feed, basically  and then sometimes my mom, too  it’s a lot on me financially,” Chang said. 
Their family is not one that goes out for boba milk teas or artisanal ice cream. 
They visit a Japanese entertainment center with $1 ice cream cones. 
Milk is the only organic product they consume. 
“I look at my credit card every month and I’m like, ‘Wow, how am I going to pay this?’ 
So I’m a little behind on bills, honestly,” Chang said. 
When their 4-year-old daughter’s preschool has leftover meat or bread, Chang’s partner, Tina Chhous, offers to take it. 
Chhous also receives monthly food assistance through the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. 
“Without that, I don’t know what I would do,” Chang said. 
Chang’s 77-year-old mother, Lien, receives SNAP aid, too, and visits two food banks each week. 
She shares the canned food, eggs and produce she gets with the rest of the family. 
Prices in the Honolulu area keep a pastry chef from shopping and eating local 
High grocery bills come with living in Hawaii. 
The state gets nearly all its food from cargo ships that have traveled thousands of miles, making prices vulnerable to oil market spikes. 
Local products also got costlier this year. 
The cost of shipping goods between the Hawaiian Islands skyrocketed amid rising fuel prices tied to the Iran conflict. 
Amanda Tabadero, 28, a pastry chef on the Hawaiian island of Oahu, remembers buying Maui-grown strawberries and blueberries for $7.99 per pound in 2024. 
Now that they cost $11, she buys berries from California or Mexico at Costco for $5 when she bakes. 
Tabadero also doubts she will buy lychee again anytime soon. 
Kaimana lychee, the variety grown in Hawaii, mostly comes from the Big Island. 
Tabadero said an iced coffee and a bag of fruit she recently purchased in Honolulu’s Chinatown came to $30. 
“It makes me sad,” Tabadero said. 
“I want to use local stuff.” 
This report is a collaboration between The Associated Press and The Lexington Observer in Massachusetts, La Esquina in Texas and Honolulu Civil Beat in Hawaii. 
AP Video Journalist Terry Chea contributed from San Francisco. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 1.1%Boston.com: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.9%Boston.com: 3.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.9%Dee-Ann Durbin: 1.9%Boston.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.9%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 3.3%Boston.com: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Dee-Ann Durbin: 1.4%Boston.com: 5.7%Framing Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 1.1%Boston.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 2.3%Boston.com: 2.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Dee-Ann Durbin: 2.9%Boston.com: 6.2%Negativity Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 3.3%Boston.com: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.5%Boston.com: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 2.0%Boston.com: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.6%Boston.com: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.6%Boston.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 9.4%Boston.com: 3.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.6%Boston.com: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.3%Dee-Ann Durbin: 7.5%Boston.com: 3.1%Hasty Generalization3.3%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 1.3%Boston.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.4%Dee-Ann Durbin: 3.8%Boston.com: 6.2%Appeal to Emotion14.4%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 1.3%Boston.com: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 2.6%Boston.com: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 1.0%Boston.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 1.1%Boston.com: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 2.6%Boston.com: 3.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 1.2%Boston.com: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dee-Ann Durbin: 13.1%Boston.com: 2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

935 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers16%attributed speech783writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageApral Jack • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageAda Torres • 3 words • 0.0% coverageAda Torres • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageApral Jack • 10 words • 0.0% coverageApral Jack • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJack Chang • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJack Chang • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJack Chang • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJack Chang • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Tabadero • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Tabadero • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jack Chang

100%flagged-word coverage
66 attributed words43% of attributed speech23% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.