Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video849 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dee-Ann Durbin results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Self-Serving Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 468 hits. Analysis detected 2,048 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,698 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (1,093 of 6,363 authors). This Dee-Ann Durbin is worse (more manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group.
Dee-Ann Durbin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠83%Dee-Ann Durbin (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,698
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510082.8% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 27.6%27.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 19.9%19.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 7.0%7.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 10.7%10.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 27.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 19.9%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos