Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These HIKARI MAE HIDA results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 135 hits. Analysis detected 359 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,870 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This HIKARI MAE HIDA is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
HIKARI MAE HIDA
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%HIKARI MAE HIDA (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,870
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.6%1.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos