NPR84%

More women are renting dresses, coats and ugly sweaters as clothing prices tick up 62%

By Kristian Monroe0%

11/17/2025, 10:01:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 321 hits. Analysis detected 2,254 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,121 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57% and a BS Rank of 62% (8,506 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the article peer group.

Lydia Patel made a big decision two years ago: she stopped buying clothes. 
"In my busy life nowadays  I realized especially after Covid  I go to work in scrubs," explains the Minnesota pharmacist, YouTube creator and mom of three. 
"I don't dress up anymore for work, so I really don't need a whole lot of new clothes." 
After seeing the outfits she rarely wore to kids' birthday parties and daytime events languishing in her closet, she thought, why not rent her wardrobe instead? 
While Rent the Runway set the tone for the clothing rental industry when it launched 16 years ago  offering designer gowns for a night  it and trendy competitors such as Nuuly now let consumers borrow a set number of items, including dresses, jeans and even winter coats, for a monthly price. 
The concept was intriguing to Patel. 
"I kind of looked into rental as an option because I don't really want to hang on to pieces forever," she said. 
"By the time I have something else to go to, the trends will have changed. 
My tastes might have changed." 
Over two years later, Patel says, deciding to rent her clothes "has opened up access to more quality pieces that are unique and fit what I want to wear at the moment without breaking the bank." 
And she doesn't have to worry about storing or washing the items she borrows. 
At the end of the rental term, she returns the pieces to the companies and they handle the shipping and cleaning. 
"I don't even know what you do with silk  and I don't want to," she says. 
Patel is just one of more than a half a million women  this industry caters almost exclusively to women  who are using clothing rental platforms, according to some of the companies' public data. 
The industry is worth $2.6 billion, and is projected to more than double in value by 2035, according to market research firm, Future Market Insights. 
Its growth is a signal that shoppers are looking for budget-friendly alternatives just as inflation and tariffs threaten to push clothing prices higher. 
The price of new clothes is rising  and tariffs aren't helping 
Apparel prices have risen 9% since February 2020, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 
That's far less than overall inflation, which has increased nearly 26% over the same time period. 
Still, experts believe, as tariffs settle in and make their way through the supply chain and into stores, consumers will start to see price tags change. 
This winter will likely see some strong increases in apparel sales. 
They'll be "driven by inflation and tariff-related price increases as brands and retailers have to pay more to import clothing," says Sky Canaves, an analyst at the market research firm eMarketer. 
For some brands, this means passing on costs to consumers will be "unavoidable," she says. 
Barely any garments are made in the U.S. today. 
If you're in the market for a new coat this winter, you may already be feeling the pinch. 
Jackets and outerwear prices rose 24% on average over the past year, according to an AlixPartners study. 
The cost increases have sent some shoppers exploring the rental and secondhand markets. 
"Services that can offer consumers the opportunity to keep their wardrobes fresh on an ongoing basis are really benefiting," says Canaves. 
It's an opportunity not lost on Patel. 
She estimates that if she purchased instead of rented her clothes, it would cost her thousands of dollars. 
Instead, using rental for just six months out of the year keeps her within the $500 she budgets annually for clothing. 
"I put my subscription on pause most of the time," she says. 
She reactivates her membership before events or trips. 
Nuuly President Dave Hayne says that's OK: "We know that subscribers aren't going to need us every month of the year, and that's fine." 
He says the company has made it easy for customers to take a break and return when they need the service. 
And so far, Hayne says, subscribers have been coming back. 
The rental industry can't escape tariffs 
However, rental fashion platforms are not immune from the impact of tariffs, which are leading to shipment cancellations and production delays. 
Fewer items reaching U.S. shores means fewer options for shoppers, Canaves says. 
Because rental platforms must keep their stock of styles constantly refreshed to meet customers' expectations, "they're exposed to many of the same cost pressures facing traditional retailers," she explains. 
It's harder for fashion rental companies to quickly pass on increased costs to consumers because their subscriptions are offered at set monthly prices. 
Hayne says Nuuly is taking multiple steps to manage the challenge of tariffs. 
"[We're] thinking about where we're sourcing from and where brands are buying from, and how we split costs," he says. 
Unlike other rental platforms, Nuuly is part of a large fashion company that also owns Anthropologie, Free People and Urban Outfitters. 
Hayne calls the relationship a "big plus" for Nuuly, allowing it to work closely with those brands on buying certain styles as well as purchasing apparel at cost. 
Rent the Runway CEO Jennifer Hyman says while her company has had "bigger fish to fry" than tariffs  after losing over half its subscriber base during the pandemic  it pays clothing brands based on the performance of its inventory, instead of buying the items outright. 
"So we've been less affected than most," she says. 
Decking the halls in a rental 
The holidays are the busiest time for fashion rental as people shop for that special look for office parties, family gatherings and New Year's Eve that they can return once the party season ends. 
But the added demand strains existing inventory challenges. 
Both Nuuly and Rent the Runway have taken efforts to avoid running out of items. 
"We heard from [our customers] that the biggest problem we had in our business was inventory availability," Hyman says. 
To address this, Rent the Runway committed to doubling the amount of styles available to its subscribers this year. 
But Hayne admits it's hard to get those numbers right. 
"One of the most important things for this business to be successful is trying to balance inventory levels with subscriber levels," he said. 
Both Hyman and Hayne's advice to consumers looking to rent for the holidays: rent as soon as you can. 
This busy holiday season Patel says she'll be wearing rented clothes. 
She hasn't decided whether it will be a fun "ugly sweater" or a velvety dress. 
Regardless, she plans to return the items in January so she doesn't have to do the laundry. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.6%Kristian Monroe: 8.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Confirmation Bias11.6%This article: 3.7%Kristian Monroe: 2.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.6%Anchoring Bias3.7%This article: 5.9%Kristian Monroe: 3.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.8%Availability Heuristic5.9%This article: 10.4%Kristian Monroe: 2.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic10.4%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Kristian Monroe: 1.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.4%Overconfidence Bias2.9%This article: 5.6%Kristian Monroe: 12.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.1%Framing Effect5.6%This article: 5.4%Kristian Monroe: 3.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Loss Aversion5.4%This article: 2.0%Kristian Monroe: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Status Quo Bias2.0%This article: 1.9%Kristian Monroe: 1.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect1.9%This article: 7.5%Kristian Monroe: 8.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Optimism Bias7.5%This article: 6.5%Kristian Monroe: 3.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Pessimism Bias6.5%This article: 4.3%Kristian Monroe: 3.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.3%Negativity Bias4.3%This article: 14.5%Kristian Monroe: 10.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Self-Serving Bias14.5%This article: 2.1%Kristian Monroe: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error2.1%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Kristian Monroe: 3.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Halo Effect5.0%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.6%Kristian Monroe: 2.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.7%Recency Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.9%Kristian Monroe: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.9%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 24.2%Kristian Monroe: 16.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.1%Appeal to Authority24.2%This article: 0.5%Kristian Monroe: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%False Dilemma0.5%This article: 1.3%Kristian Monroe: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Slippery Slope1.3%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.7%Kristian Monroe: 3.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 4.4%Hasty Generalization4.7%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 1.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.3%Kristian Monroe: 1.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.6%Appeal to Emotion3.3%This article: 2.1%Kristian Monroe: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Begging the Question2.1%This article: 11.4%Kristian Monroe: 6.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.4%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.7%Kristian Monroe: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Composition/Division3.7%This article: 10.5%Kristian Monroe: 5.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Anecdotal10.5%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.9%Kristian Monroe: 2.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Unattributed Quote7.9%This article: 4.0%Kristian Monroe: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection4.0%This article: 4.0%Kristian Monroe: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.1%Biased Writer Voice4.0%This article: 2.2%Kristian Monroe: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.0%Indoctrination2.2%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristian Monroe: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 28.6%Kristian Monroe: 10.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…28.6%

1121 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers47%attributed speech590writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageLydia Patel • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageLydia Patel • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageLydia Patel • 22 words • 0.0% coverageLydia Patel • 15 words • 100.0% coverageLydia Patel • 5 words • 0.0% coverageLydia Patel • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageLydia Patel • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageSky Canaves • 31 words • 100.0% coverageSky Canaves • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSky Canaves • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageLydia Patel • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageLydia Patel • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDave Hayne • 24 words • 100.0% coverageDave Hayne • 21 words • 100.0% coverageDave Hayne • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageSky Canaves • 12 words • 0.0% coverageSky Canaves • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDave Hayne • 13 words • 100.0% coverageDave Hayne • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDave Hayne • 28 words • 100.0% coverageJennifer Hyman • 47 words • 100.0% coverageJennifer Hyman • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageJennifer Hyman • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageDave Hayne • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDave Hayne • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageLydia Patel • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLydia Patel • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLydia Patel • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jennifer Hyman

100%flagged-word coverage
75 attributed words14% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +38.6 ptsWriter: 24.1%Jennifer Hyman: 62.7%62.7%Unattributed Quote+16.2 ptsWriter: 9.2%Jennifer Hyman: 25.3%25.3%Indoctrination-4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%Jennifer Hyman: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.4 ptsWriter: 2.4%Jennifer Hyman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.