Topic summary
82% 10 analyzed articles/videos 6,919 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ceasefire Negotiations results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 4,227 hits . Analysis detected 36,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,884 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (11,668 of 15,753 topics). This Ceasefire Negotiations is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Ceasefire Negotiations
Topic details
Total words: 33,884
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score10 analyzed articles33.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst