Topic summary
48% 13 analyzed articles/videos 12,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campaigns results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 4,933 hits . Analysis detected 50,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,009 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (13,436 of 16,502 topics). This Campaigns is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group. Campaigns
Topic details
Total words: 50,009
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score13 analyzed articles50K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst