Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos158 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Praveena Somasundaram results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 43.7% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 1,875 faulty-reasoning hits from 836 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.3% and a BS Rank of 94% (390 of 6,172 authors). This Praveena Somasundaram is worse (more manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
Praveena Somasundaram
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
94%Praveena Somasundaram (selected)10%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 836
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

94% percentile
025507510093.7% percentile
9.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles836 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 33.3%33.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 27.0%27.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 43.7%43.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 14.2%14.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.8%11.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 15.3%15.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 7.5%7.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.4%5.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 43.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 33.3%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 27.0%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 15.3%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 14.2%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.4%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate