Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Maya Homan results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 900 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,492 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,170 authors). This Maya Homan is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Maya Homan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Maya Homan (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,492
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Tu Quoque: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos