‘The Left Is Buzzing’: Free Beacon Report on El-Sayed’s Psychiatrist Wife ‘Devastating’ for Progressives, Former Dem Adviser Says 67%

By Collin Anderson79%

7/15/2026, 5:07:05 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Tu Quoque, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 51.2% saturation with 282 hits. Analysis detected 1,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 551 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (7,014 of 21,180 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the article peer group.

“The left is buzzing” over a Washington Free Beacon report on left-wing Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed's psychiatrist wife, Sarah Jukaku, who does not accept Medicare or any other insurance plan at her private practice as her husband campaigns for a single-payer “Medicare for All” system that would cover every American “from cradle to grave.” 
“Over in Michigan, meanwhile, the left is buzzing over a conservative Washington Free Beacon scoop: The wife of progressive candidate Abdul El-Sayed, a psychiatrist, doesn't accept Medicare or insurance  despite being married to a candidate demanding Medicare for All,” political reporter Rachael Bade wrote in her newsletter , the Inner Circle . 
She cited her colleague, former Democratic adviser and the Huddle cohost Dan Turrentine, who said “stories like this are 'devastating' for progressives.” 
“I'll equate it to Gavin Newsom having dinner at the French Laundry during COVID, or Nancy Pelosi getting her haircut during COVID, which is, it's this do as I say not as I do,” Turrentine, a former Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton aide, said on the show's Tuesday episode. 
“If your wife is a doctor who makes a good living and does not take Medicare  to then say we're going to advocate that everybody has to have this system, and we're going to try to use the government to force rates down on doctors, it just paints the picture of an elite that doesn't really play by the rules they're asking me to play by,” he continued. 
“In a state with working class people like Michigan  do I think this will spread and it is a huge problem of authenticity and kind of the phoniness? 
I do.” 
“Do as I say, not as I do.” 
El-Sayed champions Medicare for All, but his psychiatrist wife accepts no Medicare and no insurance. 
It “paints the picture of an elite that doesn't really play by the rules” @danturrentine @seanspicer @rachaelmbade pic.twitter.com/cFYCjqaw94 
- The Huddle (@theDChuddle) July 14, 2026 
Jukaku has a medical degree from Columbia University and a masters from the University of Oxford. 
She worked as co-chief of psychiatry at University of Michigan Health, which does accept Medicare , before starting her own Ann Arbor, Mich.-based practice, Mind Work Psychiatry, in 2024. 
Jukaku opted out of Medicare the following March, meaning she cannot bill the program, records show. 
She is also “out of network for all insurance companies,” according to her website , and thus requires all patients to pay out of pocket. 
Those with pricier private insurance plans can often submit bills to their providers to recoup some of the costs, but those with Medicare cannot. 
The arrangement stands in stark contrast to El-Sayed's campaign platform. 
He has argued that “your healthcare shouldn't depend on who signs your paycheck” and that “we can and must guarantee healthcare from cradle to grave.” 
Jukaku appears to have taken steps to hide her insurance policies. 
A Google preview of her “FAQs” page shows the question, “Do you accept my insurance? 
No.” 
That question is no longer included on the page. 
The post ‘The Left Is Buzzing’: Free Beacon Report on El-Sayed’s Psychiatrist Wife ‘Devastating’ for Progressives, Former Dem Adviser Says appeared first on . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 21.2%Collin Anderson: 4.9%freebeacon.com: 7.0%Confirmation Bias21.2%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.4%freebeacon.com: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Collin Anderson: 3.5%freebeacon.com: 2.9%Availability Heuristic9.6%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 1.3%freebeacon.com: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.5%freebeacon.com: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.4%Collin Anderson: 0.5%freebeacon.com: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.4%This article: 27.4%Collin Anderson: 15.8%freebeacon.com: 12.8%Framing Effect27.4%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.2%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 1.0%freebeacon.com: 0.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Collin Anderson: 0.5%freebeacon.com: 1.4%Pessimism Bias5.3%This article: 51.2%Collin Anderson: 14.5%freebeacon.com: 15.7%Negativity Bias51.2%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.5%freebeacon.com: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 14.5%Collin Anderson: 2.1%freebeacon.com: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error14.5%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Collin Anderson: 4.4%freebeacon.com: 2.2%In-Group Bias10.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 1.1%freebeacon.com: 1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Collin Anderson: 2.3%freebeacon.com: 2.1%Halo Effect5.3%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.6%freebeacon.com: 1.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 1.8%freebeacon.com: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.4%freebeacon.com: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 10.5%freebeacon.com: 5.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.1%freebeacon.com: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.5%Collin Anderson: 3.0%freebeacon.com: 3.8%Appeal to Authority8.5%This article: 12.7%Collin Anderson: 1.7%freebeacon.com: 2.0%False Dilemma12.7%This article: 5.3%Collin Anderson: 0.5%freebeacon.com: 0.8%Slippery Slope5.3%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 20.1%Collin Anderson: 6.8%freebeacon.com: 8.8%Hasty Generalization20.1%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 1.3%freebeacon.com: 0.9%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.4%freebeacon.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.5%Collin Anderson: 4.9%freebeacon.com: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion12.5%This article: 2.0%Collin Anderson: 0.9%freebeacon.com: 1.2%Begging the Question2.0%This article: 1.6%Collin Anderson: 1.3%freebeacon.com: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.6%This article: 37.2%Collin Anderson: 5.3%freebeacon.com: 1.0%Tu Quoque37.2%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 1.2%freebeacon.com: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 28.7%Collin Anderson: 2.9%freebeacon.com: 2.0%Anecdotal28.7%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.5%Collin Anderson: 1.9%freebeacon.com: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.5%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.9%freebeacon.com: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 2.8%freebeacon.com: 2.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 2.7%freebeacon.com: 2.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 23.8%Collin Anderson: 3.9%freebeacon.com: 2.6%Quote-first Misdirection23.8%This article: 27.6%Collin Anderson: 14.7%freebeacon.com: 17.7%Biased Writer Voice27.6%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.5%freebeacon.com: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 9.1%Collin Anderson: 1.9%freebeacon.com: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias9.1%This article: 13.2%Collin Anderson: 10.7%freebeacon.com: 10.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias13.2%This article: 0.0%Collin Anderson: 0.4%freebeacon.com: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

551 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers40%attributed speech333writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 55 words • 100.0% coverageRachael Bade • 53 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageDan Turrentine • 50 words • 100.0% coverageDan Turrentine • 69 words • 0.0% coverageDan Turrentine • 29 words • 0.0% coverageDan Turrentine • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDan Turrentine • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageThe Huddle • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Rachael Bade

100%flagged-word coverage
53 attributed words24% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+70.3 ptsWriter: 29.7%Rachael Bade: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection-21.9 ptsWriter: 21.9%Rachael Bade: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -21.9 ptsWriter: 21.9%Rachael Bade: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.