Author summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 988 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rich Kremer results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Hasty Generalization , and False Dilemma , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 426 hits . Analysis detected 3,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,036 of 6,359 authors). This Rich Kremer is worse (more manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group. Rich Kremer
Author details
Total words: 2,964
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.0% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.7% 7.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.4%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst