Topic summary
59% 11 analyzed articles/videos 9,115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These British Politics results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 8,038 hits . Analysis detected 53,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,152 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 38% (9,720 of 15,689 topics). This British Politics is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. British Politics
Topic details
Total words: 40,152
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score11 analyzed articles40.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 20.0% 20.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst