Author summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 4,284 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jill Lawless results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 3,812 hits . Analysis detected 23,991 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,828 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,658 of 6,628 authors). This Jill Lawless is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group. Jill Lawless
Author details
Total words: 23,828
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score9 analyzed articles23.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 16.0% 16.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst