AP News53%

Former Prince Andrew made money subletting cottages on his rent-free estate, report shows 34%

By Jill Lawless0%

6/5/2026, 9:43:33 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 791 faulty-reasoning hits from 567 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42% and a BS Rank of 34% (14,523 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the article peer group.

LONDON (AP)  The former Prince Andrew made money by subletting three cottages on the estate where he lived rent-free for two decades, according to a report on the royal family’s properties released Friday by the U.K. public spending watchdog. 
It also disclosed that his daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, live in rent-controlled palace properties paid for by their uncle, King Charles III. 
The National Audit Office report said Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor received income from renting out the cottages on the Royal Lodge estate, his home near Windsor Castle for more than 20 years. 
A lease for Royal Lodge signed in 2003 shows he paid only a nominal fee known as a “peppercorn rent” for the property, which included a 30-room mansion and eight cottages, three of which he was allowed to sublet. 
The amount of income was not included in the report, an omission that Margaret Hodge, a Labour member of the House of Lords and former head of Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee, said was concerning. 
“It shows an absolute total contempt for the taxpayer, not only that Andrew was able to have a peppercorn rent for a gigantic property, but then to make potentially millions on the side from subletting properties,” she said. 
The audit office review was carried out at the request of lawmakers after Mountbatten-Windsor was stripped of his royal titles and evicted from Royal Lodge by his brother, the king, following revelations about his friendship with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 
Mountbatten-Windsor has repeatedly denied wrongdoing, and has not been charged. 
Mountbatten-Windsor has featured in millions of pages of documents about Epstein released by the U.S. 
Department of Justice in January, showing how the wealthy financier used an international web of rich, powerful friends to gain influence and sexually exploit young women and girls. 
British police are looking into claims that Mountbatten-Windsor sent confidential trade information to the disgraced financier when he served as U.K. trade envoy from 2001 to 2011. 
Detectives say they may broaden their investigation to include allegations of sexual misconduct and have appealed for witnesses to come forward. 
Mountbatten-Windsor has rarely been seen in public since he moved to the Sandringham Estate, about 100 miles (160 kilometers) north of London. 
He was photographed Thursday in a car with a large bruise on his face. 
The Times of London said, without citing sources, that the bruise was the result of a “nonserious medical condition.” 
The royals’ housing arrangements 
The audit office report shows that 11 working royals receive free housing within palaces in return for their official duties. 
They include the king and Queen Camilla, Prince William and his wife Catherine, and the king’s youngest brother, Prince Edward, and his wife Sophie. 
William and Kate also have a family home near Windsor, for which they pay rent of 307,200 pounds (about $413,000) a year. 
The rents on Eugenie’s cottage in Kensington Palace and Beatrice’s apartment in St. 
James’s Palace are set at a portion of open-market value that has ranged in recent years between 50% and 68%. 
Both rents are paid out of the Privy Purse, the monarch’s private funds. 
The pair are not considered “working” royals who carry out public duties, and both have outside jobs. 
Critics of the monarchy cited the findings as evidence the royal family does not pay its way. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.0%Jill Lawless: 3.8%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias6.0%This article: 7.1%Jill Lawless: 1.2%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias7.1%This article: 13.8%Jill Lawless: 2.9%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic13.8%This article: 3.9%Jill Lawless: 1.3%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic3.9%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.7%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Jill Lawless: 2.4%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias3.4%This article: 19.8%Jill Lawless: 8.3%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect19.8%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.2%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.0%Jill Lawless: 0.7%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 3.0%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 3.8%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 21.3%Jill Lawless: 16.0%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias21.3%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 1.5%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 2.5%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.4%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 1.7%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 1.1%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 5.4%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%Jill Lawless: 1.5%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.6%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 1.8%Jill Lawless: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 4.1%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.4%Jill Lawless: 3.6%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority3.4%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 1.4%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.2%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.0%Jill Lawless: 5.3%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization3.0%This article: 7.6%Jill Lawless: 0.5%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring7.6%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.8%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.2%Jill Lawless: 6.4%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion9.2%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.8%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 4.3%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 1.8%Jill Lawless: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque1.8%This article: 6.0%Jill Lawless: 1.5%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof6.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.3%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.9%Jill Lawless: 0.5%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal4.9%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.7%Jill Lawless: 2.0%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.7%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.3%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.8%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 1.2%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 6.7%Jill Lawless: 1.4%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection6.7%This article: 6.7%Jill Lawless: 4.1%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice6.7%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.4%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.5%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jill Lawless: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

567 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers31%attributed speech391writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageNational Audit Office • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageMargaret Hodge • 34 words • 0.0% coverageMargaret Hodge • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageBritish police • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageThe Times of London • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Margaret Hodge

100%flagged-word coverage
72 attributed words41% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Quote-first Misdirection+52.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Margaret Hodge: 52.8%52.8%Biased Writer Voice+52.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Margaret Hodge: 52.8%52.8%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.