Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video84.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Margaret Hodge results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Quote-first Misdirection, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 52.8% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 373.519 faulty-reasoning hits from 84.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,141 of 28,364 speakers). This Margaret Hodge is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Margaret Hodge
Speaker details
Total words: 84.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.2% percentile
38.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos84.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 63.2%63.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 68.5%68.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 52.8%52.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 26.4%26.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 26.4%26.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 26.4%26.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.6%23.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 68.5%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 63.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 52.8%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 8.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos