Keyword summary
46% 32 analyzed articles/videos 22,438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These London results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 8,781 hits . Analysis detected 85,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 96,553 analyzed words across 32 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,250 of 37,208 keywords). This London is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group. London
Keyword details
Total words: 96,553
Article count: 32
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score32 analyzed articles96.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst