‘Like a sauna’: London tube travellers swelter in temperatures higher than legal limit for cattle 35%

By Rosie Peters-McDonald0%

7/11/2026, 8:45:06 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Overconfidence Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 227 hits. Analysis detected 1,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 999 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.5% and a BS Rank of 35% (14,284 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the article peer group.

The tube infrastructure is difficult to adapt because of its age and the surrounding clay. 
Photograph: Linda Nylind/The Guardian 
‘Like a sauna’: London tube travellers swelter in temperatures higher than legal limit for cattle 
The tube cannot easily be adapted to cope with heatwaves, making conditions almost unbearable 
As the escalator descends below ground at King’s Cross St Pancras station in London , the shift from what was already a hot station entrance to the furnace-like subterranean depths is perceptible. 
On the tube it’s worse: a man leans back in his seat, eyes closed, sweltering; people hold electric fans an inch away from their faces. 
London commuters are known for their stoicism and the heat appears to be another tribulation to accept. 
They will need to: heatwaves in the capital are becoming routine. 
“We’re quite lucky that this platform is almost empty, because when the platform gets packed it’s [like a] sauna,” Anna, a passenger at Oxford Circus, says. 
“When it’s peak hours, it’s quite difficult.” 
In the UK, it is illegal to transport cattle above 30C, but the mercury hit 32C on the train and 34C on the Victoria Line platform at Finsbury Park. 
Photograph: Linda Nylind/The Guardian 
Anna says she usually adapts well to hot temperatures, but even she finds the heat on the platform hard to bear. 
Craig, another passenger, says he has to travel in gym clothes and change into his work clothes at the office because of the heat on the tube. 
London’s underground isn’t adapted for the 30C+ heatwaves that have hit the city over the last few summers. 
Lines such as the Victoria line  the deepest on the network  and the Bakerloo line  which TfL says has some of the oldest trains in passenger use anywhere in the country  are particularly bad when it comes to withstanding the heat. 
A traveller tries to keep cool with a handheld fan. 
Photograph: Linda Nylind/The Guardian 
Sharmin, a barista at the Pret a Manger stationed by the barriers at King’s Cross St Pancras, says she has seen people faint in and around the station. 
She finds the heat so oppressive that she has asked to go home early during some of her shifts this week. 
She wonders why there are no coolers or industrial fans set up near Pret or the barriers. 
“I’ve felt like I was going to faint,” she says. 
A quick glance at the thermometer I’m carrying on this unscientific investigation shows that the station is about 30C. 
On the platform and tube it crawls up to 32C, and then at the Victoria line platform at Finsbury Park it hits 34C. 
In the UK, it is illegal to transport cattle above 30C; transporting people at 34C, though, might be becoming the norm. 
Anna, pictured at Oxford Circus, says the platform becomes like a ‘sauna’ during peak hours. 
Photograph: Linda Nylind/The Guardian 
It’s ten degrees higher underground than it is outside at this point, according to my iPhone’s built-in weather app. 
Between 8am and 9am the thermometer shows readings of 34C on the Victoria line platforms at Finsbury Park, on the Victoria and Bakerloo line platforms at Victoria, and on the northbound Bakerloo line platform at Oxford Circus. 
Tube tunnels are ‘basically radiators’, taking on the heat of the clay and concrete around them. 
Photograph: Linda Nylind/The Guardian 
Asher Minns, executive director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, a partnership across several UK universities, says that tube tunnels are “basically radiators”, taking on the heat of the clay and concrete around them. 
The carriages, platforms and surrounding tunnels are also warmed by the hundreds of kilowatts of heat the trains produce while breaking. 
And the warmer it is outside, the worse it gets underground. 
But Minns adds that the infrastructure is difficult to adapt because of its age and the surrounding clay. 
It will likely be years before the network is better suited to dealing with the heat, so for now he says the focus needs to be reducing risks to passengers. 
“It can’t go on like this, and it’s not going to get any better,” he says. 
“[The underground] absolutely has to adapt to the impacts of climate change, but right now I think [the focus] has to be looking after passengers.” 
Craig has to travel in gym clothes and change into his work clothes at the office because of the heat on the tube. 
Photograph: Linda Nylind/The Guardian 
He suggests limiting the number of passengers allowed to travel when the temperature is above a certain limit, or reducing the number of tubes in service during heatwaves. 
Nick Dent, TfL’s director of customer operations, said TfL was continuing to invest in making the network more resilient and comfortable as hotter summers become more common, as well as introducing new air-conditioned trains on the Piccadilly line and DLR. 
Dent added that the “short-term and stop-start nature of funding over recent years has meant that TfL has had to carefully prioritise its investment and  while remaining open to measures that will help manage the impact of increasing temperatures due to climate change  has focused on programmes that will see the biggest benefits to customers”. 
Explore more on these topics 
London hit by second day of Tube strike disruption this week 
London tube strike causes huge disruption, with many services hit 
London tube strikes to go ahead on Tuesday and Thursday, RMT says 
London tube strikes called off at last minute 
Hopes grow that London Underground strikes could be called off 
London faces more disruption as second 24-hour tube strike begins 
Sadiq Khan may give up armoured car as part of clampdown on SUVs in London 
London tube drivers to strike across 12 days in spring, says RMT 
London congestion charge to rise to £18  and electric vehicles will have to pay 
RMT accepts three-year pay deal for London Underground staff 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 1.3%the Guardian: 3.7%Confirmation Bias5.0%This article: 6.9%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 2.9%the Guardian: 0.6%Anchoring Bias6.9%This article: 4.2%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 4.7%the Guardian: 3.1%Availability Heuristic4.2%This article: 1.7%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.9%the Guardian: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic1.7%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 3.3%the Guardian: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias9.5%This article: 7.1%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 7.2%the Guardian: 6.1%Framing Effect7.1%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.5%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.6%Status Quo Bias1.5%This article: 5.7%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 1.4%the Guardian: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect5.7%This article: 8.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 2.0%the Guardian: 2.5%Optimism Bias8.0%This article: 4.6%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 4.6%the Guardian: 2.1%Pessimism Bias4.6%This article: 9.5%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 4.9%the Guardian: 10.4%Negativity Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.5%the Guardian: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error1.8%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 1.1%the Guardian: 3.2%Halo Effect4.5%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 1.2%the Guardian: 1.2%Recency Bias2.9%This article: 1.2%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.3%the Guardian: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.2%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 2.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 19.1%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 5.7%the Guardian: 3.8%Appeal to Authority19.1%This article: 8.3%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 3.3%the Guardian: 1.7%False Dilemma8.3%This article: 3.7%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.9%the Guardian: 1.1%Slippery Slope3.7%This article: 5.7%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 1.4%the Guardian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning5.7%This article: 4.5%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 2.1%the Guardian: 6.3%Hasty Generalization4.5%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.3%the Guardian: 0.7%Bandwagon1.0%This article: 7.2%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 4.3%the Guardian: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion7.2%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.2%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.6%the Guardian: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.2%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.8%the Guardian: 0.4%Burden of Proof3.0%This article: 2.1%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.5%the Guardian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature2.1%This article: 6.6%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 1.7%the Guardian: 0.4%Composition/Division6.6%This article: 22.7%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 12.1%the Guardian: 3.1%Anecdotal22.7%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.9%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 2.0%the Guardian: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.9%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 1.5%the Guardian: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection3.0%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.4%the Guardian: 10.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 2.5%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.6%the Guardian: 1.8%Indoctrination2.5%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosie Peters-McDonald: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

999 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers50%attributed speech497writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLinda Nylind/The Guardian • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAnna • 26 words • 0.0% coverageAnna • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageLinda Nylind/The Guardian • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAnna • 21 words • 0.0% coverageCraig • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageLinda Nylind/The Guardian • 4 words • 0.0% coverageSharmin • 28 words • 0.0% coverageSharmin • 21 words • 0.0% coverageSharmin • 17 words • 0.0% coverageSharmin • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAnna • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLinda Nylind/The Guardian • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLinda Nylind/The Guardian • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAsher Minns • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAsher Minns • 18 words • 0.0% coverageAsher Minns • 30 words • 0.0% coverageAsher Minns • 16 words • 0.0% coverageAsher Minns • 25 words • 100.0% coverageCraig • 23 words • 0.0% coverageLinda Nylind/The Guardian • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAsher Minns • 28 words • 0.0% coverageNick Dent • 40 words • 0.0% coverageNick Dent • 57 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRMT • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRMT • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRMT • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Nick Dent

100%flagged-word coverage
97 attributed words19% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Quote-first Misdirection-6.0 ptsWriter: 6.0%Nick Dent: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.