Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video999 analyzed words
BS Summary: These London Underground results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 485 hits. Analysis detected 2,978 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (23,341 of 37,536 keywords). This London Underground is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
London Underground
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠38%London Underground (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,996
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510037.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos