Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video999 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rosie Peters-McDonald results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 485 hits. Analysis detected 2,978 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (3,551 of 6,366 authors). This Rosie Peters-McDonald is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Rosie Peters-McDonald
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠45%Rosie Peters-McDonald (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,996
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510044.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 12.1%12.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Author 12.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos