Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video129.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Dent results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Sunk Cost Effect, with Circular Reasoning as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 308 faulty-reasoning hits from 129.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,226 of 28,364 speakers). This Nick Dent is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Nick Dent
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 129.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510042.8% percentile
26.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos129.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 29.4%29.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 4.6%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 6.0%Circular ReasoningSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos