Author summary
â 0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Tucker results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 4,166 hits . Analysis detected 32,665 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,653 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of â 71% (1,884 of 6,316 authors). This Steven Tucker is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group. Steven Tucker
Author details
Total words: 17,653
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.2% percentile 3.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning⌠Sitewide 1.4% Author 20.9% 20.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.9% 20.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 23.6% 23.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 10.5% 10.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.8% 6.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.2% 13.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.8%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 23.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.9%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 20.9%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.9%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst