Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Julhas Alam results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 248 hits . Analysis detected 1,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,694 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,361 authors). This Julhas Alam is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Julhas Alam
Author details
Total words: 2,694
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 9.2%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Personal Incredulity: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst