Author summary
81% 1 analyzed article/video 1,074 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Adams results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 332 hits . Analysis detected 2,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,222 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,739 of 6,171 authors). This Richard Adams is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group. Richard Adams
Author details
Total words: 3,222
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst