Keyword summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,610 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Royalty results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,705 hits . Analysis detected 13,804 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,840 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (30,197 of 34,833 keywords). This Royalty is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group. Royalty
Keyword details
Total words: 17,840
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst